DSV:海运中断难为航空货运带来大规模转移
Ocean disruption offers no easy windfall for airfreight, warns DSV
DSV 全球空运负责人 Achim Martinka 在 TIACA 迈阿密航空货运论坛上表示,海运中断并未引发大规模转向空运,紧急空运成本最高可达海运的 20 倍,多数货主仍留在海运。他称转向空运的货量仍处于较低水平,且临时现货舱位比已签合约更贵。Atlas Air 方面则表示,货代与货主越来越希望锁定专属运力,合约期限很长。

AI-generated
By Alex Lennane
2 November 2026
Disruption to ocean shipping is not triggering a large-scale switch to airfreight – the cost of emergency lift is keeping most shippers at sea, according to DSV.
Speaking at TIACA’s Air Cargo Forum in Miami last week, head of global airfreight Achim Martinka said such decisions depended on whether the business impact of a delay justified paying the airfreight premium.
“Most of the customers still stay on the seafreight side because they are not used to having shipments on time anyway,” he said. “If you have two or three weeks’ delay, this is a normal thing. And if you would switch to airfreight, it could be up to 20 times more expensive. So this is really a very tough financial decision to take.”
Conversion volumes remained limited, he said and added: “The conversion to air is still not in huge numbers. It’s still on a lower level, from what we see.”
But shippers that wait too long before seeking an alternative risk are finding any available airfreight capacity has become prohibitively expensive.
“Usually, our contracts are already signed for six or 12 months with the airlines. So everything which comes on a spontaneous, ad hoc basis will be even more expensive than the base load already on the aircraft,” Mr Martinka explained.
Where the duration of a disruption was uncertain, he said, shippers needed to begin arranging an airfreight solution.
“Otherwise, you’re going to be the last one, and then capacity is not affordable anymore.”
The competition to secure lift is also evident at Atlas Air, where Martin Drew, chief strategy and transformation officer, told The Loadstar forwarders and shippers increasingly wanted the certainty of dedicated capacity.
“The contract durations we have are very lengthy, because forwarders, in particular, and shippers want that capacity locked-in,” he said. “It helps from a planning perspective, knowing they’ve got that capacity, especially in an environment where supply is constrained.”
Atlas itself has demand for dedicated aircraft it cannot currently accommodate. Mr Drew said: “We’ve got a pipeline today of business that is tens of aircraft, and we can’t service that demand.”
However, finding space is only one obstacle to switching modes. Mr Martinka warned that ocean shipments required new documentation and operational preparation, including checks on dangerous goods, aircraft dimensions, and how cargo would need to be rebuilt for flight.
The practical difficulties were illustrated by Emir Pineda, director of air service development at Miami-Dade Aviation Department, who described an attempt to establish a sea-air movement of Honduran okra to the UK via Miami and Amsterdam.
“We were able to get a permit from USDA to transport perishable product from Central America via ship to Miami, then take it from Miami, without opening it, to the airport and then put it on an airplane and fly it to Europe. Sounds pretty simplistic, but it was actually quite complicated.
“It got to Miami: two containers – that’s a lot of cargo for one airplane.
“We had to find the capacity on a freighter, because it had to go all in one shipment [and the] capacity had to be available on the day the ship was arriving, because you only had two days to move it. Those were the conditions USDA set.
“We also had to maintain the cool chain throughout the logistics supply chain, because it had to keep a certain temperature.
“Once it got to Amsterdam, refrigerated trucks trucked it over to the UK. In the end, it worked. One time.
“Why only one time? Because of the complexity behind that. You had to get a shipper to agree to get it on the ship to Miami, and then you had to find the capacity on a consistent basis to move 60 tonnes for several weeks.
“What do you tell that customer when the season’s over? ‘Could you bring back the freight?’,” asked Mr Pineda.“That doesn’t work for forwarders; they want consistency. They want capacity availability when they need it.”
Mr Martinka said most shippers had developed some form of emergency plan since Covid, but he was not seeing a regular shift of ocean volumes into airfreight simply to maintain a contingency route.
“It is certainly a part of a resilience plan, which perhaps needs to be tested from time to time,” he said.
Forwarders and airlines had, nevertheless, become faster at adapting their networks to disruption, he added. DSV’s ACMI capacity allowed it to change destinations when customers needed alternatives.
“We have our own network, so we can decide every day with our ACMI flights where to fly. We can switch immediately if that’s needed for the customer.
“The good thing in air cargo is that airfreight is like water: it’s going to find its way.”
Check out today’s podcasts: News in Brief, focusing on ocean freight with Xeneta’s Peter Sand; and a bonus episode: news from TIACA‘s Air Cargo Forum in Miami.
来源:The Loadstar · theloadstar.com